Wren demos

Some audio demos, and patches they were made with. These are all from self playing patches (noodles).

These were all run on a samplerate of 48k with a control rate decimation of 32 to make it possible to have large patches.

2021-06-04-01-11 🕯️

download patch

02-2021-05-27-01-10 Gewoon Toevallig

download patch

03-2021-05-15-10 Het Sleutelkruid

download patch

  1. wakyct

    Tuesday, June 8, 2021 - 02:29:59

    Nice jan! I finally stress tested my tower PC with one of your big patches :). I’m curious what your audio setup is — mine currently is using Windows DirectSound with a buffer of 2048. The patch (Gewoon) maxes my CPU :).

  2. jan

    Tuesday, June 8, 2021 - 03:12:10

    I’m running it on my laptop with an RME audio interface using ASIO .. laptop is not the newest thing … the patch you mentioned runs at around 50% to 60% here for the audio thread (what Wren reports).

    Let me see what I actually have …

    An ASUS GL503VD with an i7 7700 HQ processor 2.80 GHz, windows says, and it actually runs at about 3.25 GHz with a total load over all cores of around 20% - 25%, so there is some other stuff running as well. The fan is audible but not crazy with a room temperature of 21C currently.

    The computer is from around 2018-01-01, well that was when windows was installed..

    My audio interface is an RME Fireface UFX, connected trough USB.

    I have a fairly big ASIO buffer size as well, 1024 samples, with an input and output latency of about 22ms.

  3. wakyct

    Tuesday, June 8, 2021 - 03:57:21

    Interesting, sounds like I should play with the sound setup, buffer and latency, since this benchmark seems to say my cpu should work OK, https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700HQ-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m211019vs3956

    I’m guessing the RME interface doesn’t have much to do with Wren just running the patch?

  4. jan

    Tuesday, June 8, 2021 - 15:02:13

    Yes, looks like your tower should outperform my laptop,

    But, I run the patch at 48k with a control rate decimation of 32, that might explain it?

    What I’ve noticed is that when a patch gets more complex it gets more difficult to hear the difference between 48k and 96k.

    Just ran a quick test, and I see no significant change in CPU usage when I use the laptop’s internal audio over DirectSound instead of using the RME thing with ASIO - there is more latency using DirectSound, but that’s not very relevant for a self playing patch.

    I did not really do any weird things to this laptop for speeding it up, or at least can’t recall. I probably set the CPU to high performance and processor scheduling to Background Services .. that’s about it.

    Oh and probably killed some processes, but seeing you have 6 cores / 12 threads there should be plenty of CPU for such stuff.

    But anyway, I guess it will be a sample rate thing.

  5. wakyct

    Thursday, June 10, 2021 - 04:02:30

    Yep, simple as halving the sample rate and it plays around 60% CPU. Sounds great! Like Miles Davis in space :).

Add comment

Fill out the form below to add your own comments

and please solve the "anti bot puzzle", when it is unreadable or otherwise unresolvable you can refresh the page (F5)

the answer must be entered as a number (in digits)

questions questions